|
|
Because life happens... Agility Orthopedics
|
|
Supporting our kids and serving the community:
Boys and Girls Club Mingus Union High School Marauders Cottonwood Parks and Recreation Community Softball teams Local
Baseball teams Zoomer's Bikes
WE MOVED to better serve
you 450 S Willard Street, #115 Cottonwood, AZ 86326. Manzanita Medical Complex; with Urgent Care, Family Health Providers
Healthcare at its finest
Thursday, April 30,
2009 --Verde Valley NewsEditor:
Recently, I had knee surgery in the Verde Valley Medical Center. My physician
was Bradley Williams.
We are so fortunate to have a first place award winning orthopedic center there. The nurses
are very professional and compassionate. Dr. Williams is an outstanding surgeon.
My rehab therapy is being
done by caring, well-trained personnel right here in Camp Verde. I've been in several hospitals, but none can equal
the care I received there.
I don't know why anyone would choose to go to Flagstaff or Phoenix when we have such
an outstanding facility and medical personnel in our Verde Valley.
Thanks to all of them.
Jerry
McElhaney
My Turn: Let's stick to the plan for Rec Center | Dr. Brad Williams, My Turn
Tuesday, June 03, 2008 --Verde Valley Independent
What a beautiful area we live in. The weather is pretty much
as good as it gets, the scenery is spectacular, and the people of the community are warm and genuine.
I see hundreds
of people a month in my office and around the community and can assure you that we are here because we know what matters in
life. You could say we have our priorities straight.
People do not come here for the money. We come here to raise
our families in an incredible setting filled with wonderful supportive people.
The benefits of the Cottonwood
Recreation Center are immeasurable: obesity and diabetes treatment and prevention, presentations and seminar facility, prevention
of drug use and other unlawful or unhealthy alternatives, increased property values, drawing good families and professionals
to the Verde Valley, and general community involvement.
The Recreation Center will be a place where we can leave
our work behind and all meet and enjoy our families and friends or perhaps even swim alongside the mayor and share our ideas
for a better community. Spending time at the community center ... priceless. If we're going to invest in anything for our
community, this is it.
Since we are spending upwards of $20 million, it stands to reason we should do our best
to build the Recreation Center the right way the first time. The "disappointing changes" are far from inevitable
when it comes to this type of project.
Yes, we did lose the second floor of our DMV. However, it's entirely different
for a DMV to lose a second floor due to downsizing compared to losing key components of a year-round community center such
as an indoor pool and walking track. Did you know the substitute walking track plans are actually very dangerous? In addition,
many DMV activities are now done online, and downsizing may have been the appropriate solution for that project.
The Recreation Center project, on the other hand, is entirely different. The Recreation Center is truly an investment in
our community. We are going to grow regardless, and the Recreation Center will encourage a year-round healthy and active lifestyle
for present and future inhabitants of the Verde Valley.
There is no doubt that proceedings with the original or
improved plans and ensuring local labor and materials are used for building our Recreation Center will benefit our community
the most.
The promise of a spectacular Recreation Center played a major role in moving our family here. Thus, my
first ever town hall meeting regarding the fate of the Recreation Center was too important to miss. Apparently, the record
number of supportive comments presented from our concerned citizens so moved our galeophobic councilman, that even he somewhat
rescinded his pessimistic position.
I guess Mr. Kirby isn't a grumpy old man after all he really has a nice smile.
Even though the "golden ring" is just within our reach, and the Jaws music has faded, we may have to settle for
something that is actually much less than was originally voted on and promised.
Because some delays and errors
in calculations, the Recreation Center we voted upon can no longer be completed for the original $17 million. Since time is
money, there is no doubt we should move ahead as soon as possible.
However, the designers have compromised the
original plans and sacrificed safety and the indoor jogging/walking track and pool. With the altered plan, the track has such
extensive cross traffic that an excited child or just about anyone could easily collide with someone just trying to regain
their mobility. The other idea of a track around the basketball court is even more ridiculous. Furthermore, since the altered
plans do not provide the key indoor amenities of the original plan, and it is possible that a significant number of people
voted for the Recreation Center because of these amenities, we cannot proceed with anything other than the original plan without
another vote. Some may argue we need a vote either way, but there are other options.
Why rush into building an
unsafe Recreation Center that lacks several crucial activity elements when we have a voter-approved plan from two years prior?
If we change anything, we should take advantage of advances in technology such as low energy LED lighting, water efficient
plumbing and fixtures, and up to date solar panels (In less than two years, due to advances in technology, solar panels will
be 10 to 20 times less costly.) Perhaps we could have many of these fixtures donated by companies in exchange for the excellent
marketing they would receive. Phoenix Cement is committed to provide many tons of donated concrete and they should be well
recognized for their generosity.
Perhaps we could even have a green Recreation Center that sets the standard for
low water usage and energy independence or at least an improved version of the original plan.
Plenty of generous
people, churches and businesses can help to make the original plan a reality. With enough donations, the total cost of the
center could possibly be closer to the original estimate or even less. Additional revenue can be obtained by leasing office
space to medical and other professionals or perhaps small healthful commercial vendors such as Jamba Juice or other local
alternatives could have space in the center as well.
Further, we can proportionately reward donations with named
bricks, tiles, rooms, structures or perhaps the entire complex. Low rate membership fees, room rentals, events and other sources
should pay for utilities and maintenance of the facility.
Let's not tarnish our dream with complaints about money
and instead find a way to give us what we were promised. Get everyone involved so we may have the solid gold ring we were
promised rather than a cheaper substitute that will sacrifice year-round enjoyment by our children and grandparents alike.
Give our community a chance to show how much the Recreation Center means to us by moving forward with the original or improved
plans (utilizing low energy, water conserving technology) now.
One option would be to reach out to the community
for some assistance so we may have the original perhaps even a revised greener Recreation Center. We could wait a couple of
months for donations to arrive, but I think we can start groundbreaking on the original plan and ask for donations, volunteers
and general regional support. There are some in this community who could surprise us by paying for the entire jogging track
or indoor pool. Though I have only been here a couple of years, I know the people of our community. You're going to love meeting
them at our new Recreation Center.
If we're going to spend the money, then we'd better do this right. Get involved.
Let the mayor and city council know how you feel and how we can all help. Great things will happen.
Dr. Brad Williams
is the owner of Agility Orthopedics in Cottonwood.
|
Reader Comments
Posted: Friday, June 06, 2008 Article comment by: cdenter
It is great to
hear from someone who is willing to do something to make the Rec Center happen. Thank you Dr. Williams! As for Mark Miskiel's
"let's wait" attitude - for how long? The Rec Center has been in the capital improvement plan for at least 10 years
but there never was the money. Now, we have the money. If we don't build it now - when will we and how much more of it will
we lose by waiting? Where will more money come from if we wait? I hear estimates are that we lose $170,000 worth of rec center
every month we delay. Additionally, we have to pay interest on the bond whether we use it or not. We might as well use it
and enjoy at least some benefits.
Posted: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 Article comment
by: Mark Miskiel
A well written editorial and the optimism is refreshing however while
it is tempting to say lets build it now, why not wait till the economic climate has changed and it can be built correctly
without compromise. While construction costs will rise with a delay, it would be far better to wait and build something state
of the art. Possibly some of the technology mentioned by Dr. Williams will also come down in cost during the wait. I sure
would hate to see something as important as the recreation center done poorly because of the rush to go forward now. Good
things come to those who wait and maybe we need to consider that right now. I'm just worried that the community will end up
with half of what was promised and if we had waited, maybe we could have had a more functional recreation center without any
compromise in the facility.
Posted: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 Article comment by: crooney1955
I love your optimism! You look at the glass as half full rather than half empty. It's refreshing
to see someone that looks for ways to accomplish things rather than looking for ways to not do something. Your alternatives
make sense. There are people in our community with the means (financial and brains) to make things happen. Many citizens legacy
will be that of cronic complainers. Obviously your legacy will be that of someone who creatively tried to accomplish good
things for the community. Thank you for your constructive comments.
News: Support your community Agility Orthopedics is a proud supporter of Cottonwood local sport teams. Arizona, USA : 2006 — Dr.Bradley Williams MD. PhD. became one of the first
surgeons in the state of Arizona to perform partial knee replacement surgery utilizing the Oxford® Unicompartmental
Knee System and one of a handful of surgeons in the country to performing the Combined anterior cruciate
reconstruction and Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
Leading surgeons in Oxford, England, along with engineers at Biomet, headquartered in Warsaw,
Indiana, developed the unicompartmental (partial) knee system, which was previously not available in the U.S. The Oxford®
Knee is the only FDA-approved Free Floating Meniscal Unicompartmental knee system available in the United States and has been
utilized throughout Europe for more than two decades.
Often recognized as the most widely used and clinically proven unicompartmental knee system
in the world, the Oxford® Knee System had demonstrated excellent clinical results. Surgeons in the U.S. now
have access to this system whose clinical results have equalled that of the most successful total knee replacements.1
Unlike total knee replacement involving removal of all the knee joint surfaces, a unicompartmental
knee replacement replaces only one side of the knee joint. Knee osteoarthritis usually occurs first in the medial (inside)
compartment, as this side of the knee bears most of the weight. In knees that are otherwise healthy, a unicompartmental approach
allows the outer compartment and all ligaments to remain intact. By retaining all of the undamaged parts, the joint may function
more naturally.
In a healthy knee, the meniscal cartilage serves as a shock absorber between the ends of the bones. The Oxford®
Knee is the first unicompartmental implant with an artificial meniscal bearing designed to glide freely throughout the knee’s
range of motion to more closely replicate normal movement. The free floating nature of the device also greatly improves durability
of the implant.1
The Oxford® System offers a precisely instrumented system designed to
balance the soft tissues and to accurately reproduce normal knee motion. The Oxford® Knee may also allow for
a more rapid recovery due to the use of minimally invasive instrumentation and technique. With proper use of the Oxford®
instruments, the operation can be performed through a small incision with great precision.
“My first patient walked within hours of surgery and was discharged
to home within 24 hours requiring nothing but oral pain medication,” said Dr. Williams.
Individual results may vary. There are potential risks to knee replacement surgery. Visit
www.biomet.com and read “Risk Information.” The life of any joint replacement will depend on your physical condition,
activity levels, willingness to follow surgeon’s instructions, and other factors. Only an orthopedic surgeon can determine
whether you are a candidate for knee replacement surgery.
1Murray,
D.W.; O’Conner, J.J.; and Goodfellow, J.W.: “The Oxford Medial Unicompartmental Arthroplasty. A Ten Year Survival
Study.” JBJS (Br), No. 6, 80-B: 983-989, 1998
Lois Neville 82 of Sedona climbs Mount Whitney: Lois Neville,
82 of Sedona climbs Mount Whitney with her family and friends. A patient of Dr. Brad Williams MD., Neville was able to realize her
dream within less than 6 months after arthroscopic knee surgery.
Neville was a registered nurse who moved
to Sedona 13 years ago. An avid hiker and swimmer, she began experiencing sharp pains in knee. She consulted Dr. Williams
and underwent arthroscopy surgery and physical therapy with her focus on getting up, out and climbing the 14,496 ft Mount
Whitney. Within 6 months of her surgery, she did it - 22 miles round trip, a 6,000 foot elevation gain and at over 14,000
feet, it is the highest peak inthe lower 48 states.
Congratulations Lois, you are an inspiration on how to live.
Get up, Get out, Get going......
Ask the Doctor
What is the difference between a
total knee replacement and the Oxford unicompartmental knee?
1) The longevity
of a total knee is generally not more than 15 to 20 years and the Oxford uni has a 95% survival rate of 30 yrs and counting 2) The total knee usually relieves pain very well but it "feels different" than your natural
knee. The Oxford only replaces the damaged portion of the knee and relies on balancing the knee's natural ligaments.
This gives the Oxford knee a more natural feel and improved function over a total knee. 3) The incision
is much smaller and does not cut the muscle. This allows a very rapid recovery with less pain and stiffness than a total knee.
Why does the doctor do the combined ACL Uni and not do the ACL surgery
1st and 6 months or a year later do the Unicompartmental?
This may still be an option as some
will obtain temporary relief of pain with the ACL reconstruction alone. Still some may have continued arthritis pain
following the ACL reconstruction. Although doing the combined procedure is more difficult than either procedure alone,
Dr. Williams has been doing the combined procedure with excellent results. This eliminates time and financial burdens
of two surgical procedures and recoveries, which allows patients more quickly return to activities they've only dreamed
of being able to do again.
Why Are Joints Replaced?
Osteoarthritis is the most
common reason for joint replacement. A unicompartmental knee replacement
is typically used for patients who have osteoarthritis in limited parts of their knee. Osteoarthritis
(OA ) is a disease that involves the breakdown of cartilage in one or more joints. Cartilage
is a strong, smooth material that caps the articulating, or moving surfaces of the bones in
the joint. It allows bone surfaces to glide against each other when you move. When the gliding cartilage
breaks down or wears away, the bones grind against each other, which can cause pain and limited joint movement.
Is There A Cure For Osteoarthritis?
There is no known cure. The best that doctors can do for patients is
to restore motion and reduce pain. Fortunately, joint replacement has proven
effective in accomplishing these goals for most patients.
Does Joint
Replacement Work?
After a joint
replacement surgery, many patients experience reduced pain, increased mobility, and improved quality of life. The performance
and life span of an implant depends on many factors, including the patient’s presurgical physical condition, anatomy,
weight, activity, and willingness to follow surgeon’s instructions before and after surgery.
What is Unicompartmental
Knee Replacement Surgery?
Unlike
total knee replacement involving removal of all the knee joint surfaces, a unicompartmental knee
replacement replaces only one side of the knee joint. Knee osteoarthritis usually occurs first in the
medial (inside) compartment as this side of the knee bears most of the weight. In knees that are otherwise
healthy, a unicompartmental approach allows the outer compartment and all ligaments to
remain intact. By retaining all of the undamaged parts, the joint may bend better and function more naturally.
Are there different types of unicompartmental knee replacement?
Yes. There are different designs on the market, and the most significant
difference is whether the polyethylene (plastic) lining of the new knee is
free to move or not. A moving plastic bearing (as in the Oxford® Knee System) is known as a mobile bearing
type. When a plastic bearing cannot move, the replacement is a fixed bearing
type.
|